ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Evolution

Evolution

Volume 61 Issue 12, Pages 2743 - 2749

Published Online: 15 Sep 2007

© 2010, Society for the Study of Evolution



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 100K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

DO WE NEED AN EXTENDED EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS?
Massimo Pigliucci 1
  1 Department of Ecology & Evolution, Stony Brook University, 650 Life Science Bldg., Stony Brook New York 11794  E-mail: pigliucci@genotypebyenvironment.org
Associate Editor: M. Rausher
Copyright Journal compilation © 2007 The Society for the Study of Evolution
KEYWORDS
Epigenetic inheritance • evolutionary novelties • extended evolutionary synthesis • Modern Synthesis • paradigm shift • phenotypic plasticity

ABSTRACT

The Modern Synthesis (MS) is the current paradigm in evolutionary biology. It was actually built by expanding on the conceptual foundations laid out by its predecessors, Darwinism and neo-Darwinism. For sometime now there has been talk of a new Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), and this article begins to outline why we may need such an extension, and how it may come about. As philosopher Karl Popper has noticed, the current evolutionary theory is a theory of genes, and we still lack a theory of forms. The field began, in fact, as a theory of forms in Darwin's days, and the major goal that an EES will aim for is a unification of our theories of genes and of forms. This may be achieved through an organic grafting of novel concepts onto the foundational structure of the MS, particularly evolvability, phenotypic plasticity, epigenetic inheritance, complexity theory, and the theory of evolution in highly dimensional adaptive landscapes.


Received August 15, 2007
Accepted August 16, 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
EVO
Special Issue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Special Issue: Race Reconciled: How Biological Anthropologists View Human Variation.

Read Now

Also of Interest
Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology.

View a Free Sample Copy

Sign up for Content Alerts