If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() EvolutionVolume 61 Issue 2, Pages 377 - 387 Published Online: 12 Feb 2007 © 2010, Society for the Study of Evolution Published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Evolution
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 143K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking NATURAL SELECTION ON A POLYMORPHIC DISEASE-RESISTANCE LOCUS IN IPOMOEA PURPUREA Copyright 2007 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2007 The Society for the Study of Evolution KEYWORDS Coevolution • evolution of resistance • plant–pathogen interactions • costs of resistance •
Coleosporium
ABSTRACTAlthough disease-resistance polymorphisms are common in natural plant populations, the mechanisms responsible for this variation are not well understood. Theoretical models predict that balancing selection can maintain polymorphism within a population if the fitness effects of a resistance allele vary from a net cost to a net benefit, depending upon the extent of pathogen damage. However, there have been a few attempts to determine how commonly this mechanism operates in natural plant–pathogen interactions. Ipomoea purpurea populations are often polymorphic for resistance and susceptibility alleles at a locus that influences resistance to the fungal pathogen, Coleosporium ipomoeae. We measured the fitness effects of resistance over three consecutive years at natural and manipulated levels of damage to characterize the type of selection acting on this locus. Costs of resistance varied in magnitude from undetectable to 15.5%, whereas benefits of resistance sometimes equaled, but never exceeded, these costs. In the absence of net benefits of resistance at natural or elevated levels of disease, we conclude that selection within individual populations of I. purpurea probably does not account completely for maintenance of this polymorphism. Rather, the persistence of this polymorphism is probably best explained by a combination of variable selection and meta-population processes. Received July 6, 2006 |