ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 577K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Using biological metrics to score and evaluate sites: a nearest-neighbour reference condition approach
SAMANTHA C. BATES PRINS* AND ERIC P. SMITH
  *Department of Mathematics & Statistics, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, U.S.A.
  Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A.
Correspondence to Samantha C. Bates Prins, Department of Mathematics & Statistics, James Madison University, MSC 1911, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, U.S.A.
E-mail: prinssc@jmu.edu
Copyright 2007 The Authors, Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
Benthic Assessment of Sediment • multimetric • River Invertebrate Prediction and Classification System • standards assessment • stressor–response

Summary

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences

1. Reference (i.e. least or minimally impaired) sites can provide important information about the expected range of biological metrics and can be used to establish impairment or non-impairment of a test site. A problem with using reference data is that biological metrics are affected by natural conditions. We present an approach that uses local information to adjust for natural conditions and a method for statistically evaluating condition at a test site using biological metrics.

2. Our method consists of four steps: selection of a distance measure to find neighbours of a test site, selecting natural variables to measure the distance, selection of the number of neighbours and calculating a scored metric.

3. We use a simulated example to illustrate when the nearest-neighbour approach improves classification of sites as reference or not reference.

4. Using a set of data from the Mid-Atlantic Highlands, we show that the nearest-neighbour method improved on the ability of a regression approach to correctly classify test sites known to be from a non-reference group without affecting the ability to correctly classify test sites known to be from the reference group.


(Manuscript accepted 10 October 2006)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01675.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Also of Interest

Multiple Stressors Special Issue
Papers from the first FBA Aquatic Summit Conference on ‘Multiple stressors’ are now freely available online in Freshwater Biology.

Download Papers > >

Sign up here
Journal Backfiles