ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 662K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

On the evolutionary history of stars and their fossil mass and light
Mark A. Fardal 1★ , Neal Katz 1 , David H. Weinberg 2 and Romeel Davé 3
  1 Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA   2 Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA   3 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Correspondence to   E-mail: fardal@fcrao1.astro.umass.edu
Copyright 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 RAS
KEYWORDS
galaxies: stellar content • diffuse radiation

ABSTRACT

Abstract
          1 INTRODUCTION
          2 CALIBRATIONS OF STELLAR ENERGY OUTPUT
          3 OBSERVATIONAL MEASURES
          4 COMPARISON OF STAR FORMATION MEASURESREFERENCES

The total extragalactic background radiation can be an important test of the global star formation history (SFH). Using direct observational estimates of the SFH, along with standard assumptions about the initial mass function (IMF), we calculate the total extragalactic background radiation and the observed stellar density today. We show that plausible SFHs allow a significant range in each quantity, but that their ratio is very tightly constrained. Current estimates of the stellar mass and extragalactic background are difficult to reconcile, as long as the IMF is fixed to the Salpeter slope above  1 M . The joint confidence interval of these two quantities only agrees with that determined from the allowed range of SFH fits at the 3σ level, and for our best-fitting values the discrepancy is about a factor of 2. Alternative energy sources that contribute to the background, such as active galactic nuclei (AGN), Population III stars or decaying particles, appear unlikely to resolve the discrepancy. However, changes to the IMF allow plausible solutions to the background problem. The simplest is an average IMF with an increased contribution from stars around  1.5–4 M . A 'paunchy' IMF of this sort could emerge as a global average if low-mass star formation is suppressed in galaxies experiencing rapid starbursts. Such an IMF is consistent with observations of star-forming regions, and would help to reconcile the fossil record of star formation with the directly observed SFH.


Accepted 2007 January 17. Received 2006 December 3; in original form 2006 April 26

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11522.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member