ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 154K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Effects of Faculty, Fields, and Institutions Over Time*
Gerhard Sonnert 1 , Mary Frank Fox 2 and Kristen Adkins 3
  1 Harvard University
  2 Georgia Institute of Technology
  3 The University of Texas at Austin

  *Direct correspondence to Gerhard Sonnert, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138 〈gsonnert@cfa.harvard.edu〉. The authors will share all data and coding information with those wishing to replicate the study. The research reported in this article was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (SES-0080638). We thank Judith Singer for advice in the early phase of this project and Lowell Hargens for his reading of an earlier version of this article.

Copyright © 2007 by the Southwestern Social Science Association

ABSTRACT

Objective. Taking an institutional approach to the determinants of outcomes for women in science and engineering, we examine the effects on women's percentages among undergraduate majors and among degree recipients of four basic factors: (1) the percentage of faculty who are women in the students' major science/engineering area; (2) the students' disciplines (biology, physical sciences, and engineering); (3) the type of institution in which students are enrolled ("Research I" vs. others); and (4) a time trend (1984–2000).

Method. We use longitudinal, multivariate, and multi-institutional data from the Integrated Postsecondary Data System (IPEDS) and from a mail survey of registrars.

Results. Over the observation period, the women's percentages have risen steadily. The effects of disciplines and departments are stronger than those of institutions. Especially notable is that the percentages of women among undergraduate science/engineering majors and degree recipients are associated with the percentages of women among the faculty in these fields.

Conclusion. The findings contribute empirically to the discussion about the effects of "role models" for the participation and performance of women in science and engineering—and point to the strong effects of departments, compared to institutions, in accounting for degrees awarded to undergraduate women.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00505.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information
SSQU

CALL FOR PAPERS!

Submit your paper to Social Science Quarterly!


CLICK HERE for details.

SSSA Membership
Hot Topic

Special Issue on David Sears

POPS

Political Psychology recently published a special Forum on David O. Sears' Ongoing Contribution to Political Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to offer free online access to all the articles from this special journal issue.

Start reading!

IT'S TIME TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP


It’s time to renew your membership in Southwestern Social Science Association.

Click here for 2010 membership rates and to renew securely online.

Politics