ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 188K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Special Article
A new era in finding Type 2 diabetes genes—the unusual suspects
RD Lawrence Lecture 2006
T. M. Frayling
Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Correspondence to: Timothy M. Frayling, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK. E-mail: tim.frayling@pms.ac.uk
Copyright © 2007 The Author.
Journal compilation © 2007 Diabetes UK. Diabetic Medicine
KEYWORDS
type 2 diabetes • genome-wide association • risk • Mendelian randomization

Diabet. Med. 24, 696–701 (2007)

ABSTRACT

In 1988 the task of identifying Type 2 diabetes genes was described as a nightmare. For the next 17 years this proved to be largely correct. In the meantime the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes rose sharply due to non-genetic factors, compounding the problem of trying to find genes. Despite a huge amount of effort, progress was disappointing and only two genes, PPARG and KCNJ11, were confirmed beyond doubt as Type 2 diabetes risk factors in multiple studies. The reasons for this have been well documented and mainly consist of the use of inappropriate levels of statistical inference given the many hundreds of thousands of potential risk polymorphisms in the genome and their small effect sizes. The good news is that these problems are now surmountable and prospects for finding many more genes are bright. This year saw the identification of a third gene, TCF7L2, that has a greater impact on risk than the first two and provided important lessons for Type 2 diabetes genetic studies. The most important of these lessons was that previously unsuspected genes may be involved. In this review I discuss why this year is the start of a new era in our understanding of Type 2 diabetes genes and how this may lead to improved patient care.


Accepted 5 February 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02172.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member