ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Restoration Ecology

Restoration Ecology

Volume 15 Issue 3, Pages 494 - 505

Published Online: 26 Jul 2007

© 2010 Society for Ecological Restoration International



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 765K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Freshwater Habitat Restoration Actions in the Pacific Northwest: A Decade's Investment in Habitat Improvement
Stephen L. Katz, 1,2 Katie Barnas, 1 Ryan Hicks, 3 Jeff Cowen, 3 Robin Jenkinson 4
  1 Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA 98112, U.S.A.
  3 Scientific Data Management, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA 98112, U.S.A.
  4 College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, U.S.A.
  2 Address correspondence to S. L. Katz, email steve.katz@noaa.gov
Copyright 2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International
KEYWORDS
bioinformatics • data management systems • effectiveness monitoring • fisheries management • habitat conservation • implementation monitoring • river restoration database

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionLITERATURE CITED

Across the Pacific Northwest (PNW), both public and private agents are working to improve riverine habitat for a variety of reasons, including improving conditions for threatened and endangered salmon. These projects are moving forward with little or no knowledge of specific linkages between restoration actions and the responses of target species. Targeted effectiveness monitoring of these actions is required to redress this lack of mechanistic understanding, but such monitoring depends on detailed restoration information—that is, implementation monitoring. This article describes the process of assembling a database of restoration projects intended to improve stream and river habitat throughout the PNW. We designed the database specifically to address the needs of regional monitoring programs that evaluate the effectiveness of restoration actions. The database currently contains spatially referenced, project-level data on over 23,000 restoration actions initiated at over 35,000 locations in the last 15 years (98% of projects report start or end dates between 1991 and 2005) in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana. Data sources included federal, state, local, nongovernmental organization, and tribal contributors. The process of database production identified difficulties in the design of regional project tracking systems. The technical design issues range from low-level information such as what defines a project or a location to high-level issues that include data validation and legalities of interagency data sharing. The completed database will inform efficient monitoring design, effectiveness assessments, and restoration project planning.


Received: 25 May 2007; Accepted: 23 July 2007;
DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00245.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


REC
REC
Sign up here