ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Restoration Ecology

Restoration Ecology

Volume 15 Issue 3, Pages 563 - 572

Published Online: 26 Jul 2007

© 2010 Society for Ecological Restoration International



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 273K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Evaluating Stream Restoration in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed through Practitioner Interviews
Brooke A. Hassett, 1,2,4 Margaret A. Palmer, 1,3 Emily S. Bernhardt 1,2
  1 Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.
  2 Present address: Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A.
  3 Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD 20688, U.S.A.
  4 Address correspondence to Brooke Hassett, email bhassett@duke.edu
Copyright 2007 Society for Ecological Restoration International
KEYWORDS
Chesapeake Bay • ecosystem management • monitoring • restoration • river • watershed

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionLITERATURE CITED

River restoration is an integral part of restoring the Chesapeake Bay. As part of the National River Restoration Science Synthesis (NRRSS), we conducted 47 independent interviews with stream restoration project managers randomly selected from a database of 4,700 projects in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Here we present results from those interviews and characterize patterns in project goals, design, and expenditures, trends in project evaluation, and characterize project success as reported by interviewees. Interviewed practitioners reported that the majority of their projects were designed by private consultants. One-third of projects were part of a watershed management plan and 70% were linked to other projects within the same watershed. Most interviewees considered their projects to be successful, and 76% of projects had conducted some form of project-associated monitoring. Although most interviewees based their evaluation of success on observations or monitoring data, respondents indicated that very few projects had explicitly stated quantifiable project objectives within their design plans. Many interviewed practitioners specifically commented at the end of the surveys on the important role of stakeholder involvement and the need for initiatives to fund project monitoring.


Received: 25 May 2007; Accepted: 23 July 2007;
DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00251.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


REC
REC
Sign up here