ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Developing World Bioethics

Developing World Bioethics

Volume 7 Issue 1, Pages 19 - 24

Published Online: 14 Aug 2006

Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 64K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

THE PERSPECTIVES OF RESEARCHERS ON OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
SAM K. NEWTON 1 AND JOHN APPIAH-POKU 2
  1 Kintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana
  2 School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Correspondence to  Sam K. Newton, Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana. samkofinewton@yahoo.com; John Appiah-Poku, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. jappiahpoku@yahoo.com
Copyright © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS
ethics • developing countries • informed consent

ABSTRACT

AbstractINTRODUCTIONMETHODSINTERVIEWEESRESULTSAcknowledgements

Background: The doctrine of informed consent (IC) exists to protect individuals from exploitation or harm. This study into IC was carried out to investigate how different researchers perceived the process whereby researchers obtained consent. It also examined researchers' perspectives on what constituted IC, and how different settings influenced the process.

Methods: The study recorded in-depth interviews with 12 lecturers and five doctoral students, who had carried out research in developing countries, at a leading school of public health in the United Kingdom. A purposive, snowballing approach was used to identify interviewees.

Results: Although the concept and application of the doctrine of IC should have been the same, irrespective of where the research was carried out, the process of obtaining it had to be different. The setting had to be taken into consideration and the autonomy of the subject had to be respected at all times. In areas of high illiteracy, and where understanding of the subject was likely to be a problem, there was an added responsibility placed on the researcher to devise innovative ways of carrying out the study, taking into consideration the peculiarities of the environment.

Conclusion: The ethical issues for IC were the same, irrespective of where the research was conducted. However, because the backgrounds, setting, and knowledge of populations differed, there was the need to be similarly sensitive in obtaining consent. The problems of obtaining genuine IC were not limited to developing countries.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00147.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Bioethics