ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

American Journal of Political Science

American Journal of Political Science

Volume 51 Issue 1, Pages 151 - 165

Published Online: 4 Jan 2007

© 2010 Midwest Political Science Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 169K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition
Margit Tavits 1
  1 University of Missouri-Columbia
Correspondence to  Margit Tavits is assistant professor of political science, University of Missouri-Columbia, 113 Professional Building, Columbia, MO 65211 (tavitsm@missouri.edu) and Post-Doctoral Prize Research Fellow, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 1NF.

I would like to thank Taavi Annus, Christine Cheng, Jonathan Krieckhaus, Patrik Marier, and Barbara Trish for valuable comments on various drafts of this article. An earlier version of the article was presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 20–23, 2006.

Copyright 2007, Midwest Political Science Association

ABSTRACT

This article investigates the electoral effect of party policy shifts. I argue that whether party policy shifts are damaging or rewarding depends on whether the shift occurs in the pragmatic or principled issue domain. On pragmatic issues, voters value "getting things done." Policy shifts in this domain signal responsiveness to the changing environment and are likely to be rewarded. Principled issues, however, concern core beliefs and values. Any policy shift in this domain is a sign of inconsistency and lack of credibility, which is likely to lead to voter withdrawal. These arguments are supported by evidence from 23 advanced democracies over a period of 40 years.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00243.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Call for Papers
POLP

Do you have a paper of wide interest in politics or policy? Submit it to Politics & Policy!

Politics & Policy uses a
state-of-the-art online submission and peer review system that will help bring your research to publication as quickly as possible!

CLICK HERE for submission details.

Special Issue
POPS

VIRTUAL ISSUE: Psychological Perspectives on Politics

Access this free virtual issue of Political Psychology that uses psychological theory and methods to explore important questions in political science.

Read now

Hot Topic

Special Issue on David Sears

POPS

Political Psychology recently published a special Forum on David O. Sears' Ongoing Contribution to Political Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to offer free online access to all the articles from this special journal issue.

Start reading!

Global Policy
Politics