ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volume 55 Issue 6, Pages 832 - 839

Published Online: 19 Apr 2007

Journal compilation 2010 The American Geriatrics Society/Wiley Periodicals, Inc.



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 111K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Resident Outcomes in Small-House Nursing Homes: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Initial Green House Program
Rosalie A. Kane, PhD * , Terry Y. Lum, PhD , Lois J. Cutler, PhD * , Howard B. Degenholtz, PhD , and Tzy-Chyi Yu, MHA *
From the  *Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, and  School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and  Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
 Address correspondence to Rosalie A. Kane, PhD, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, D527 Mayo Building, MMC Box 197, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: kanex002@umn.edu
Copyright © 2007, The American Geriatrics Society
KEYWORDS
nursing home • culture change • quality of life • longitudinal outcomes • quality indicators

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of a small-house nursing home model, THE GREEN HOUSE® (GH), on residents' reported outcomes and quality of care.

DESIGN: Two-year longitudinal quasi-experimental study comparing GH residents with residents at two comparison sites using data collected at baseline and three follow-up intervals.

SETTING: Four 10-person GHs, the sponsoring nursing home for those GHs, and a traditional nursing home with the same owner.

PARTICIPANTS: All residents in the GHs (40 at any time) at baseline and three 6-month follow-up intervals, and 40 randomly selected residents in each of the two comparison groups.

INTERVENTION: The GH alters the physical scale environment (small-scale, private rooms and bathrooms, residential kitchen, dining room, and hearth), the staffing model for professional and certified nursing assistants, and the philosophy of care.

MEASUREMENTS: Scales for 11 domains of resident quality of life, emotional well-being, satisfaction, self-reported health, and functional status were derived from interviews at four points in time. Quality of care was measured using indicators derived from Minimum Data Set assessments.

RESULTS: Controlling for baseline characteristics (age, sex, activities of daily living, date of admission, and proxy interview status), statistically significant differences in self-reported dimensions of quality of life favored the GHs over one or both comparison groups. The quality of care in the GHs at least equaled, and for change in functional status exceeded, the comparison nursing homes.

CONCLUSION: The GH is a promising model to improve quality of life for nursing home residents, with implications for staff development and medical director roles.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01169.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information
JGS Impact Factor

AGS Membership
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter