If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() European Journal of Soil ScienceVolume 58 Issue 1, Pages 343 - 353 Published Online: 24 Aug 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 British Society of Soil Science Published on behalf of the British Society of Soil Science (and the National Societies of Soil Science in Europe)
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 574K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Multivariate calibration of hyperspectral γ-ray energy spectra for proximal soil sensing Copyright 2006 The Authors Journal compilation Summary
The development of proximal soil sensors to collect fine-scale soil information for environmental monitoring, modelling and precision agriculture is vital. Conventional soil sampling and laboratory analyses are time-consuming and expensive. In this paper we look at the possibility of calibrating hyperspectral γ-ray energy spectra to predict various surface and subsurface soil properties. The spectra were collected with a proximal, on-the-go γ-ray spectrometer. We surveyed two geographically and physiographically different fields in New South Wales, Australia, and collected hyperspectral γ-ray data consisting of 256 energy bands at more than 20 000 sites in each field. Bootstrap aggregation with partial least squares regression (or bagging-PLSR) was used to calibrate the γ-ray spectra of each field for predictions of selected soil properties. However, significant amounts of pre-processing were necessary to expose the correlations between the γ-ray spectra and the soil data. We first filtered the spectra spatially using local kriging, then further de-noised, normalized and detrended them. The resulting bagging-PLSR models of each field were tested using leave-one-out cross-validation. Bagging-PLSR provided robust predictions of clay, coarse sand and Fe contents in the 0–15 cm soil layer and pH and coarse sand contents in the 15–50 cm soil layer. Furthermore, bagging-PLSR provided us with a measure of the uncertainty of predictions. This study is apparently the first to use a multivariate calibration technique with on-the-go proximal γ-ray spectrometry. Proximally sensed γ-ray spectrometry proved to be a useful tool for predicting soil properties in different soil landscapes. Received 14 December 2005; revised version accepted 26 May 2006 |