If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 227K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Collective Marketing Arrangements for Geographically Differentiated Agricultural Products: Welfare Impacts and Policy Implications
Sergio H. Lence 1 , Stéphan Marette 1 , Dermot J. Hayes 1 , William Foster 1
  1 Sergio Lence is professor of economics and Marlin Cole Chair of International Agricultural Economics at Iowa State University. Stéphan Marette is with the UMR Economie Publique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), INAPG, and is a visiting scholar at CARD, Iowa State University. Dermot Hayes is Pioneer Hi-Bred International Chair in Agribusiness and professor of economics and of finance at Iowa State University. William Foster is professor at the Universidad Católica in Santiago, Chile.

This research was funded by the Center for Agriculture and Rural Development at Iowa State University.

Copyright 2007 American Agricultural Economics Association
KEYWORDS
agricultural products • collective promotion • geographic indications • supply control • quality

ABSTRACT

We examine the incentives of atomistic producers to differentiate and collectively market products. We analyze market and welfare effects of alternative producer organizations, discuss circumstances under which they will evolve, and describe implications for the ongoing debate between the EU and the United States. As fixed costs of development and marketing increase and the anticipated market size falls, it becomes essential to increase the producer organization's ability to control supply to cover the fixed costs associated with the introduction of differentiated products. Counterintuitively, stronger property right protection for producer organizations may enhance welfare even after a differentiated product has been developed.


[Received May 2006;
accepted February 2007.]

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01036.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Also of Interest
AGEC

Agricultural Economics

Click here to access a FREE sample issue.

Become a new member!

Canadian Agricultural Economics Society

Benefits include a supscription to Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.

Click here for details.