ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Fish Biology

Journal of Fish Biology

Volume 70 Issue sa, Pages 1 - 15

Published Online: 13 Feb 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles



Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 338K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Cytogenetic characterization of six species of flatfishes with comments to karyotype differentiation patterns in Pleuronectiformes (Teleostei)
M. F. C. Azevedo*†, C. Oliveira*, B. G. Pardo, P. Martínez F. Foresti*
  * Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Distrito de Rubião Jr. s/no. 18.618-000, Botucatu, Brazil and   Laboratório de Genética, Faculdade de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Universitario de Lugo, Lugo, Spain
Correspondence to   Tel. and fax: +55 22 2759-3431; email: marisafca@yahoo.com
Copyright 2007 The Authors Journal compilation
KEYWORDS
chromosome banding • cytotaxonomy of flatfishes • in situ hybridization (ISH) • karyotype • NOR phenotype

ABSTRACT

The karyotypes and cytogenetic characteristics of flatfishes species Paralichthys orbignyanus, Paralichthys patagonicus, Citarichthys spilopterus and Etropus crossotus (Paralichthyidae), Bothus ocellatus (Bothidae) and Symphurus tessellatus (Cynoglossidae) were investigated by conventional [Giemsa staining, C-banding, Ag- and chromomycin (CMA3)-stainings] and molecular [in situ hybridization (ISH)] cytogenetic techniques. The results showed 2n = 46 and FN = 48 (2msm + 46sta) in P. orbignyanus, 2n = 46 and FN = 46 (46sta) in P. patagonicus, 2n = 26 and FN = 44 (18msm + 8sta) in C. spilopterus, 2n = 38 and FN = 64 (26msm + 12sta) in E. crossotus, 2n = 32 and FN = 50 (18msm + 14sta) in B. ocellatus, and 2n = 46 and FN = 62 (46msm + 62sta) in S. tessellatus. All species exhibited weak C-band positive segments in terminal and centromeric positions of some chromosome pairs. Silver staining of the nucleolus organizer regions (Ag-NOR) technique showed a single Ag-NOR-bearing chromosome pair in all species except E. crossotus. All these sites were CMA3 positive and showed clear ISH signals after probing with a 18S rRNA probe. Etropus crossotus presented until seven chromosomes with Ag-NORs and CMA3 positively stained segments in five chromosome pairs. Conversely only one chromosome pair was identified with the ISH experiments in this species. The available results show that the fishes of the order Pleuronectiformes experienced a marked chromosome evolution that included reduction in diploid number, mainly due to Robertsonian rearrangements, and several chromosome inversions.


(Received 17 August 2004, Accepted 3 August 2006)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01287.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Click here to go to the conference website
Sign up here