ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Volume 54 Issue 5, Pages 699 - 720

Published Online: 30 Oct 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 Scottish Economic Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 189K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

WAGE AND EMPLOYMENT DETERMINATION THROUGH NON-COOPERATIVE BARGAINING
Kevin Roberts *
  * Oxford University
Copyright © 2007 Scottish Economic Society
KEYWORDS
Non-cooperative bargaining • Multi-issue bargaining • Non-commitment • Unions
KEYWORDS
C72 • C78 • J51 • J52

ABSTRACT

Abstract
          I
          
					INTRODUCTION
          II
          
					THE MODEL
          III
          
					EFFICIENT AGREEMENTS
          IV
          
					NEGOTIATION EQUILIBRIAREFERENCES

This paper investigates wage and employment determination by a group of workers or union and a firm, making use of the techniques of non-cooperative bargaining. Previous analyses have examined wage determination with an artificial restriction that employment is determined either before or after wage determination has occurred. Here, employment determination is made part of the bargaining process. With two variables being determined, there is bargaining with a variable pie and solutions correspond to equilibria without commitment. Two different notions of efficiency – exchange and pie efficiency – are relevant and serve to characterise equilibria. Multiple equilibria are shown to arise naturally once exchange inefficient proposals are possible. In all equilibria there is overemployment. Factors that restrict a firm's ability to alter the labour force during or after the wage-bargaining process are shown, paradoxically, to benefit the firm.


Date of receipt of final manuscript: 1 August 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9485.2007.00437.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Join the Scottish Economic Society!

IT'S TIME TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP


It’s time to renew your membership in the Scottish Economic Society.

Click here for 2010 membership rates and to renew securely online.