ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Grass and Forage Science

Grass and Forage Science

Volume 62 Issue 3, Pages 346 - 354

Published Online: 1 Aug 2007

Erratum:

© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd


The Journal of the British Grassland Society and the Official Journal of the European Grassland Federation
British Grassland Society
Go to Society Site


< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 489K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Effects of ruminal fill on short-term herbage intake rate and grazing dynamics of beef heifers
P. Gregorini*†, S. A. Gunter*, C. A. Masino* and P. A. Beck*
  *Division of Agriculture, Southwest Research and Extension Center, University of Arkansas, Hope, AR, USA, and
  Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
Correspondence to S. A. Gunter, Southwest Research & Extension Center, 362 Highway, 174 North Hope, AR, USA.
E-mail: sgunter@uaex.edu
Copyright 2007 The Authors Journal Compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS
grazing behaviour • herbage intake • ruminal fill • grazing dynamics

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgmentsReferences

The impact of manipulating ruminal fill (RF) on intake rate of herbage and grazing dynamics was measured with three rumen-cannulated beef heifers grazing Bermudagrass pastures individually. The treatments compared were removal of proportions of rumen contents of 0 (treatment RF0), 0·33 (treatment RF33), 0·66 (treatment RF66) and 1·00 (treatment RF100). Treatments were randomly applied in a 3 × 4 Youden-square design. The rumens were emptied before and after planned grazing sessions (30 min) to set up the treatments, and to estimate intake rate and bite mass, respectively. Measurements were made of bite rate, bites per feeding station, feeding stations per minute, intake per feeding station, time per feeding station, eating and searching step rates and times. Apparent bite area and area grazed per feeding station were calculated. Ruminal fill affected short-term intake rate and changed grazing dynamics. As RF increased, step rates, searching times, bite mass, apparent bite area, bites per feeding station, area grazed per feeding station, time per feeding station and intake per feeding station decreased (< 0·01) while step times, eating step rates and bite depth increased (< 0·01). The results of the present study indicate that RF is an important factor governing the intake characteristics and behaviour of grazing beef heifers.


Received 11 September 2006; revised 26 January 2007

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00589.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member