ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Bioethics

Bioethics

Volume 21 Issue 4, Pages 208 - 217

Published Online: 14 Mar 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 140K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

'YOU DON'T MAKE GENETIC TEST DECISIONS FROM ONE DAY TO THE NEXT'– USING TIME TO PRESERVE MORAL SPACE
JACKIE LEACH SCULLY 1,2 , ROUVEN PORZ 2 AND CHRISTOPH REHMANN-SUTTER 2
  1 Newcastle University, United Kingdom
  2 University of Basel
Correspondence to  Jackie Leach Scully, School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, 5th floor Claremont Bridge, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom. Email: jackie.scully@ncl.ac.uk
Copyright © 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS
genetic testing • prenatal testing • Huntington's disease • cancer • decision making • qualitative research • ethics

ABSTRACT

AbstractTIME AND MORAL DECISION-MAKINGTHE TEMPORAL STRUCTURE OF GENETIC TESTING DECISIONSPATIENT-CENTRED RESEARCH INTO GENETIC TESTING DECISIONSPRENATAL TESTING:  I'LL CROSS THAT BRIDGE WHEN I COME TO IT Acknowledgements

The part played by time in ethics is often taken for granted, yet time is essential to moral decision making. This paper looks at time in ethical decisions about having a genetic test.

We use a patient-centred approach, combining empirical research methods with normative ethical analysis to investigate the patients' experience of time in (i) prenatal testing of a foetus for a genetic condition, (ii) predictive or diagnostic testing for breast and colon cancer, or (iii) testing for Huntington's disease (HD). We found that participants often manipulated their experience of time, either using a stepwise process of microdecisions to extend it or, under the time pressure of pregnancy, changing their temporal 'depth of field'. We discuss the implications of these strategies for normative concepts of moral agency, and for clinical ethics.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00546.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Developing World Bioethics