ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Conservation Biology

Conservation Biology

Volume 21 Issue 5, Pages 1186 - 1195

Published Online: 19 Sep 2007

©2010, Society for Conservation Biology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1224K)  | Supporting Information | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Genetic Data and the Listing of Species Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
SYLVIA M. FALLON*
  *Science Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 2005, U.S.A., email sfallon@nrdc.org.
Copyright 2007 Society for Conservation Biology
KEYWORDS
distinct population segment • listing decisions • U.S. Endangered Species Act
KEYWORDS
Acta de Especies en Peligro de E. U. A. • decisiones de enlistado • segmento poblacional distinto

ABSTRACT

Abstract:  Genetic information is becoming an influential factor in determining whether species, subspecies, and distinct population segments qualify for protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Nevertheless, there are currently no standards or guidelines that define how genetic information should be used by the federal agencies that administer the act. I examined listing decisions made over a 10-year period (February 1996–February 2006) that relied on genetic information. There was wide variation in the genetic data used to inform listing decisions in terms of which genomes (mitochondrial vs. nuclear) were sampled and the number of markers (or genetic techniques) and loci evaluated. In general, whether the federal agencies identified genetic distinctions between putative taxonomic units or populations depended on the type and amount of genetic data. Studies that relied on multiple genetic markers were more likely to detect distinctions, and those organisms were more likely to receive protection than studies that relied on a single genetic marker. Although the results may, in part, reflect the corresponding availability of genetic techniques over the given time frame, the variable use of genetic information for listing decisions has the potential to misguide conservation actions. Future management policy would benefit from guidelines for the critical evaluation of genetic information to list or delist organisms under the Endangered Species Act.

ABSTRACT

Datos Genéticos y el Enlistado de Especies en el Acta de Especies en Peligro de E.U.A.

Resumen:  La información genética se está convirtiendo en un factor influyente para determinar sí una especie, subespecie y segmentos poblacionales distintos califican para ser protegidos por el Acta de Especies en Peligro de E. U. A. Sin embargo, actualmente no hay estándares o lineamientos que definan como deben utilizar información genética las agencias federales que administran el acta. Examiné las decisiones de enlistado basadas en información genética tomadas en un período de 10 años (febrero 1996–febrero 2006). Hubo una amplia variación en los datos genéticos utilizados para informar las decisiones de enlistado en términos de cuáles genomas (mitocondrial vs. nuclear) fueron muestreados y el número de marcadores (o técnicas genéticas) y los loci evaluados. En general, las agencias federales identificaron diferencias genéticas entre unidades taxonómicas putativas o poblaciones dependiendo del tipo y cantidad de datos genéticos. Los estudios que se basaron en marcadores genéticos múltiples tuvieron mayor probabilidad de identificar distinciones, y esos organismos tuvieron mayor probabilidad de recibir protección, que los estudios basados en un solo marcador genético. Aunque los resultados pueden, en parte, reflejar la disponibilidad de técnicas genéticas para decisiones de enlistado en el período analizado, el uso variable de información genética para la toma de decisiones puede desinformar acciones de conservación. Las políticas de manejo futuras se beneficiarían de directrices para la evaluación crítica de información genética para enlistar o quitar de la lista a organismos bajo el Acta de Especies en Peligro.


Paper submitted May 9, 2006; revised manuscript accepted May 16, 2007.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00775.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

New Editor for Conservation Biology

CBI

Dr. Erica Fleishman has been appointed the new Editor-in-Chief of Conservation Biology as of January 1, 2010.

Click here for more information

WIREs Climate Change
Now Available

Free Article from Conservation Biology

CBI=

The article One Hundred Questions of Importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity is now available FREE online.

Click here to read the article

Sign up here

Also of Interest
Conservation Letters

Conservation Letters

Conservation Letters is a new, online-only scientific journal publishing empirical and theoretical research with significant implications for the conservation of biological diversity.

Free Access to all in 2009 and 2010!

Available on Blackwell Synergy


Also of Interest
Conservation

Conservation

Conservation is a sophisticated, readable, and utterly practical magazine for people who are serious about conservation.

View FREE sample issue

Special Issue
JOSI

New Perspectives on Psychology and Human–Animal Interactions

This issue of Journal of Social Issues focuses on human attitudes toward the use of other species, the effects of relationships with companion animals on human health and well-being, and the ethical and policy implications of our interactions with other species.

Read Free Issue