ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Volume 102 Issue 2, Pages 313 - 318

Published Online: 15 Aug 2006

Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for Applied Microbiology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 525K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. on the surface and within chicken breast fillets
P. Luber and E. Bartelt
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Division of Biological Safety, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence to Petra Luber, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Unit 106: Foods of Animal Origin, Food Hygiene, and National Contact Point for Inspections, Mauerstrasse 39/42, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: petra.luber@bvl.bund.de
Copyright 2007 The Authors Journal compilation 2007 The Society for Applied Microbiology
KEYWORDS
Campylobacter • chicken meat • distribution of numbers • exposure • package • quantification

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences

Aim: To investigate how many Campylobacter bacteria are present on the surface and inside chicken breast fillets, with a focus on generating data distributions which can be used in risk assessments for this pathogen–commodity combination.

Methods and Results: We analysed 100 fresh retail chicken breast fillets (skinless and deboned) by means of a rinse sample for surface and 55 fillets for internal pathogen contamination using 10 g meat and a most probable number technique. Prevalence was 87% on the surface and 20% in the deep tissue. The mean number of Campylobacter on the surface of the fillets was 1903 CFU, with a median of 537 CFU and a maximum of 38 905 CFU. Campylobacter counts inside the tissue were <1 CFU g−1 meat (mean = 0·24 CFU, median = 0·15 CFU, maximum = 0·74 CFU). In addition, we investigated the influence of the type of package on the occurrence of the pathogen. Data provide an indication of less favourable conditions for survival of the pathogen on chicken meat packed under a modified atmosphere of carbon dioxide in nitrogen, in comparison with ambient air or vacuumed packages.

Conclusions: Given the high numbers of the pathogen on the chicken meat surface in comparison with low levels of internal contamination, it can be concluded that cross-contamination during the preparation of contaminated chicken is a more important pathway for consumers' exposure to Campylobacter than the consumption of undercooked meat.

Significance and Impact of the Study: The detailed quantitative data on the occurrence of C. jejuni and C. coli on the surface and inside chicken meat presented here can be useful for future probabilistic exposure assessments.


2006/0029: received 10 January 2006, revised 7 March 2006 and accepted 2 June 2006

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03105.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Influenza
 NAME OF HEADING
Click here to find out more
E-mail alerts
Sign up for e-alerts
Asia Scientists Click Here
Journal Backfiles