If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Environmental MicrobiologySee Also: Volume 9 Issue 1, Pages 197 - 205 Published Online: 14 Sep 2006 © 2010 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd Published jointly with the Society for Applied Microbiology
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 199K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Comparison of chitinolytic enzymes from an alkaline, hypersaline lake and an estuary Copyright © 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2006 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd ABSTRACTWe examined the genetic and physiological characteristics of chitin degrading enzymes expressed by fosmids cloned from two strains of chitinolytic gammaproteobacteria isolated from alkaline, hypersaline Mono Lake, California; and from a metagenomic library derived from an estuarine bacterial community (Dean Creek, Sapelo Island, GA, USA). The Mono Lake chitinolytic enzymes presented unique adaptations in terms of halo- and alkalitolerance. The sequence from one of the Mono Lake isolates (strain 12A) was a conventional family 18 glycosyl hydrolase; however, the expressed protein had a novel secondary activity peak at pH 10. We obtained a novel family 20 glycosyl hydrolase sequence from Mono Lake strain AI21. The activity of the expressed protein had a pH optimum of 10, several pH units higher than any other enzyme currently assigned to this family, and the enzyme retained 80% of its activity at pH 11. The enzyme was also halotolerant, retaining activity in salt solutions of up to 225 g l Received 12 April, 2006; revised 12 July, 2006; accepted 21 July, 2006. |