ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Environmental Microbiology

Environmental Microbiology

See Also:

Volume 9 Issue 1, Pages 197 - 205

Published Online: 14 Sep 2006

© 2010 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 199K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Comparison of chitinolytic enzymes from an alkaline, hypersaline lake and an estuary
Gary R. LeCleir, 1 Alison Buchan, 2 John Maurer, 3 Mary Ann Moran 1 and James T. Hollibaugh 1 *
 Departments of 1Marine Sciences and   3 Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  2 Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Correspondence to   *E-mail aquadoc@uga.edu; Tel. (+1) 706 542 5868; Fax (+1) 706 542 5888.
Copyright © 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2006 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd

ABSTRACT

We examined the genetic and physiological characteristics of chitin degrading enzymes expressed by fosmids cloned from two strains of chitinolytic gammaproteobacteria isolated from alkaline, hypersaline Mono Lake, California; and from a metagenomic library derived from an estuarine bacterial community (Dean Creek, Sapelo Island, GA, USA). The Mono Lake chitinolytic enzymes presented unique adaptations in terms of halo- and alkalitolerance. The sequence from one of the Mono Lake isolates (strain 12A) was a conventional family 18 glycosyl hydrolase; however, the expressed protein had a novel secondary activity peak at pH 10. We obtained a novel family 20 glycosyl hydrolase sequence from Mono Lake strain AI21. The activity of the expressed protein had a pH optimum of 10, several pH units higher than any other enzyme currently assigned to this family, and the enzyme retained 80% of its activity at pH 11. The enzyme was also halotolerant, retaining activity in salt solutions of up to 225 g l−1. Sequence analysis indicated a molecular weight of ∼90 kDa for the protein, and that it contained two active sites. Culture supernatant contained two chitinolytic proteins, 45 and 31 kDa, suggesting possible post-expression modification of the gene product. In contrast, the sequence found in the estuarine metagenomic library and the functional characteristics of the protein expressed from it were those of a conventional family 18 glycosyl hydrolase.


Received 12 April, 2006; revised 12 July, 2006; accepted 21 July, 2006.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01128.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Special Issue
Click here to read the Special Issue
Click here to go to the conference website
Announcing
Environmental Microbiology Annual Lecture
E-mail alerts
Sign up for e-alerts