|
If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||
  Journal of Sexual MedicineVolume 4 Issue 6, Pages 1626 - 1634 Published Online: 21 Sep 2007 © 2010 International Society for Sexual Medicine
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 140K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking  ORIGINAL RESEARCH—OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Validation of the Erection Hardness Score Copyright 2007 International Society for Sexual Medicine KEYWORDS Erectile Dysfunction • Erection Hardness • Patient-reported Outcome ABSTRACT
Introduction. Erection hardness is a fundamental component of erectile function, and is a very specific and easily monitored outcome. The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item, patient-reported outcome (PRO) for scoring erection hardness. Aims. The aim of this article is to report the psychometric validation of the EHS. Methods. The dataset (N = 307) was from a multinational sildenafil trial (efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [ED]) with a 2-week screening phase, a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, and a 6-week open-label extension. Main Outcome Measures. Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity (ability to differentiate between ED severity groups defined by the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] questionnaire), convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients with domain scores of the IIEF and the Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ]), treatment responsiveness, and clinically important difference. Results. The EHS demonstrated good test–retest reliability, acceptable quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity against the IIEF (including clear differentiation between normal and impaired erectile function), moderate-to-strong convergent validity against the prespecified domains of the IIEF and QEQ, and high treatment responsiveness. Conclusion. The EHS has desirable measurement properties, including being highly responsive to treatment. This one-item PRO is robust and easy to use for evaluating erection hardness. Psychometric analysis supports the use of the EHS as a simple, reliable, and valid tool for the assessment of erection hardness in clinical trials research. Mulhall JP, Goldstein I, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, and Hvidsten K. Validation of the Erection Hardness Score. J Sex Med 2007;4:1626–1634. | 
|
