ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Value in Health

Value in Health

Volume 10 Issue 4, Pages 294 - 304

Published Online: 3 May 2007

© 2010 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 293K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Validation of a Condition-Specific Measure for Women Having an Abnormal Screening Mammography
John Brodersen, MD, GP, PhD, Hanne Thorsen, MD, PhD, Svend Kreiner, MSc
Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Correspondence to  John Brodersen, Department of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 24Q, Postbox 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: j.brodersen@gpmed.ku.dk
Copyright 2007, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)
KEYWORDS
adverse effects • false-positive reactions • mass screening • questionnaire design

ABSTRACT

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the validity of a new condition-specific instrument measuring psychosocial consequences of abnormal screening mammography (PCQ-DK33).

Methods: The draft version of the PCQ-DK33 was completed on two occasions by 184 women who had received an abnormal screening mammography and on one occasion by 240 women who had received a normal screening result. Item Response Theories and Classical Test Theories were used to analyze data. Construct validity, concurrent validity, known group validity, objectivity and reliability were established by item analysis examining the fit between item responses and Rasch models.

Results: Six dimensions covering anxiety, behavioral impact, sense of dejection, impact on sleep, breast examination, andsexuality were identified. One item belonging to the dejection dimension had uniform differential item functioning. Two items not fitting the Rasch models were retained because of high face validity. A sick leave item added useful information when measuring side effects and socioeconomic consequences of breast cancer screening. Five "poor items" were identified and should be deleted from the final instrument.

Conclusions: Preliminary evidence for a valid and reliable condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography was established. The measure includes 27 "good" items measuring different attributes of the same overall latent structure—the psychosocial consequences of abnormal screening mammography.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00184.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information
VHE Impact Factor

Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now