ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Austral Ecology

Austral Ecology

Volume 32 Issue 3, Pages 277 - 286

Published Online: 29 Mar 2007

© 2010 Ecological Society of Australia



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 190K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Do Australian small mammals respond to native and introduced predator odours?
BENJAMIN G. RUSSELL* AND PETER B. BANKS
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
Correspondence to   *Present address: Pest Management Unit, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW, 1481, Australia. Email: benjamin.russell@environment.nsw.gov.au
Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of Australia
KEYWORDS
feral predators • invasive species • predator–prey interactions • scent-marking • signal exploitation

ABSTRACT

Abstract  Coevolution is thought to have led to many small mammal species avoiding the scent marks of their main mammalian predators, as they provide a reliable cue to predation risk. Most support for this hypothesis comes from northern hemisphere predator/prey systems, however, it is unclear whether this avoidance of predator faecal odour occurs in Australia's mammalian fauna, which has evolved in relative isolation from the rest of the world, and is dominated by marsupials rather than placentals. We tested this theory for an Australian system with marsupial and placental predators and prey, that share a long-term (>1 million years) or short-term (<150 years) exposure to each other. The predators were the native marsupial tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced placental red fox Vulpes vulpes. The potential prey were three native rodent species, the bush rat Rattus fuscipes, the swamp rat Rattus lutreolus, the eastern chestnut mouse Pseudomys gracilicaudatus, and the marsupial brown antechinus Antechinus stuartii. Small mammals were captured in Elliott traps with 1/3 of traps treated with fox faeces, 1/3 treated with quoll faeces and the remainder left untreated. The native rodent species all showed avoidance of both tiger quoll and red fox odours whereas the marsupial antechinus showed no responses to either odour. Either predator odour avoidance has not evolved in this marsupial or their reaction to predator odours may be exhibited in ways which are not recognizable through trapping. The avoidance by the rodents of fox odour as well as quoll odour indicates this response may either be due to common components in fox and quoll odour, or it may be a recently evolved response.


Accepted for publication June 2006.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01685.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here