If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() American Journal of Economics and SociologyVolume 66 Issue 4, Pages 697 - 726 Published Online: 17 Oct 2007 © 2010 The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 128K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking The "Sect Effect" in Charitable Giving: Distinctive Realities of Exclusively Religious Charitable Givers *Russell N. James III, 203 Consumer Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; e-mail Rjames@uga.edu. Dr. James's research interests include charitable giving. Deanna L. Sharpe, 239-C Stanley Hall, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211; e-mail SharpeD@missouri.edu. Dr. Sharpe's research interests include consumer expenditure patterns and later-life economic issues and policy. Copyright 2007 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc. ABSTRACTAbstract. An examination of the charitable giving behavior of 16,442 households reveals intriguing patterns consistent with the club-theoretic approach to religious sect affiliation. The club-theoretic model suggests that individuals with lower socioeconomic standing will rationally be more likely to align themselves with exclusivistic sects. Because sect affiliation is also associated with more obligatory religious contributions, this approach generates novel predictions not anticipated by standard economic models of charitable behavior. Traditional analysis of charitable giving can mask the "sect effect" phenomenon, as low-income giving is dwarfed by the giving of the wealthy. However, the application of a two-stage econometric model—separating the participation decision from the subsequent decision regarding the level of gifting—provides unique insights. Basic socioeconomic factors have significant and opposite associations with different categories of giving, calling into question the treatment of charitable giving as a homogenous activity and supporting the understanding of sect affiliation, and potentially religious extremism, as rational choice phenomena. |