ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Law & Social Inquiry

Law & Social Inquiry

Volume 32 Issue 3, Pages 701 - 724

Published Online: 16 Aug 2007

© 2009 American Bar Foundation



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 125K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Last Words, Last Meals, and Last Stands: Agency and Individuality in the Modern Execution Process
Daniel LaChance 1
  1 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Copyright © 2007 American Bar Foundation

ABSTRACT

Despite the historical transformation of executions in the United States into cloistered, bureaucratic affairs, two past practices have persisted in modern executions: the opportunities for the condemned to request a special last meal and to make a speech to those assembled to witness the execution. The retention of these practices and the communication of their contents by the state and the media to the public reinforce a conception of those executed as autonomous actors, endowed with agency and individuality. Through these practices, the state and the media reflect and strengthen the oxymoronic construction of offenders in contemporary discourses as self-made monsters who are intrinsically different by choice. Presenting offenders in this way may ultimately maintain the emotional satisfaction needed to sustain the death penalty. Arguments are supported by published last meal requests and final statements in the state of Texas.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00074.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
JFCJ

Free access available to Juvenile and Family Court Journal for a limited time


SIGN UP NOW for 30 days of FREE online access!

Hot Topic
CAPP

Criminology & Public Policy offers the most downloaded articles of 2008!

Click on the links below for FREE access:

LSI

IT'S TIME TO RENEW

LSI

It’s time to renew your subscription to Law & Social Inquiry.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Law
Law