If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||
![]() Psychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesVolume 61 Issue 1, Pages 20 - 24 Published Online: 12 Jan 2007 Journal compilation © 2010 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 51K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Regular Article Medical cost analysis of family psychoeducation for schizophrenia Copyright © 2007 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2007 Folia Publishing Society KEYWORDS health economics • medical cost • psychoeducation • schizophrenia ABSTRACTAbstract Family psychoeducation has been shown to prevent the relapse of schizophrenia. However, whether medical costs are reduced by this approach remains uncertain. The subjects were patients with schizophrenia who lived with high-expressed emotion (EE) families and were at high risk of relapse. A total of 30 patients whose families underwent psychoeducation and intensive family sessions or psychoeducation and subsequent support were regarded as the psychoeducation group. A high-EE group without family psychoeducation made up of 24 patients was used as a control group. The mean outpatient medical cost, duration of hospitalization, inpatient medical cost, and total medical cost during the follow-up period were compared between the psychoeducation group and the control group. The mean inpatient medical cost was ¥270 000 in the psychoeducation group and ¥470 000 in the control group. The mean total medical costs were ¥500 000 in the psychoeducation group and ¥710 000 in the control group. The cost in the psychoeducation group was significantly lower than the control group by Mann–Whitney U-test. The proportion of patients with a total medical cost greater than the median value was 23% in the psychoeducation group and 54% in the control group with a significant difference. The medical cost can be reduced in the psychoeducation group compared with the control group due to the prevention of re-hospitalization by family psychoeducation. Received 16 May 2005; revised 21 August 2006; accepted 27 August 2006. |
|