ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 135K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

MINISTERIAL ADVISERS, POLITICIZATION AND THE RETREAT FROM WESTMINSTER: THE CASE OF NEW ZEALAND
CHRIS EICHBAUM 1 RICHARD SHAW 2
  1 Chris Eichbaum is in the School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington.  2Richard Shaw is in the Politics Programme, Massey University, New Zealand.
Copyright 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation

ABSTRACT

Political advisers are an established third element in a number of Westminster-styled jurisdictions, as they are in New Zealand's institution of executive government. In this paper we report the initial findings of a research project focusing on the role and accountabilities of ministerial advisers in New Zealand. We locate these findings in the context of a growing body of international and comparative research on the role and accountabilities of non civil- or public-service advisers within political executives and comment on the extent to which the findings affirm or refute the view that the 'third element' constitutes a threat to the continued application of Westminster principles and practices in New Zealand's system of government – once described as more Westminster than Westminster. In doing so, we highlight deficiencies in standard conceptions of politicization and argue that there is a need to more clearly differentiate between its procedural and substantive dimensions.


Date received 18 December 2005. Date accepted 20 February 2006.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00666.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Hot Topic

Special Issue on David Sears

POPS

Political Psychology recently published a special Forum on David O. Sears' Ongoing Contribution to Political Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to offer free online access to all the articles from this special journal issue.

Start reading!

IT'S TIME TO RENEW

PADM

It’s time to renew your subscription to Public Administration.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Global Policy
Politics