ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Ibis

Ibis

Volume 149 Issue 4, Pages 671 - 692

Published Online: 19 Jun 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 British Ornithologists' Union



Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 370K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Review
Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations
PAUL F. DONALD*
RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK
Correspondence to   *Email: paul.donald@rspb.org.uk
Copyright © 2007 The Author
Journal compilation © 2007 British Ornithologists' Union
KEYWORDS
Allee effect • cooperative breeding • demography • heterogamety • operational sex ratio • polygamy

ABSTRACT

Offspring sex ratios in wild bird populations, and the extent to which they vary from the equality expected by random genotypic sex determination, have received much recent attention. Adult sex ratios (ASRs) in wild birds, on the other hand, remain very poorly described, and many of the questions about them posed by Ernst Mayr in 1939 remain unanswered. This review assesses population-level sex ratio patterns in wild bird populations, with an emphasis on the ASR. A quantitative assessment of over 200 published estimates of ASR, covering species from a wide range of taxa, regions and habitats, supported Mayr's assertion that skewed ASRs are common in wild bird populations. On average, males outnumbered females by around 33%, and 65% of published estimates differed significantly from equality. In contrast, population-level estimates of offspring sex ratio in birds did not generally differ from equality, and mean ASR across a range of wild mammal species was strongly female-skewed. ASR distortion in birds was significantly more severe in populations of globally threatened species than in non-threatened species, a previously undescribed pattern that has profound implications for their monitoring and conservation. Higher female mortality, rather than skewed offspring sex ratio, is the main driver of male-skewed ASRs in birds, and the causes and implications of this are reviewed. While estimates of ASR in wild bird populations may be subject to a number of biases, which are discussed, there is currently no quantitative evidence that an ASR of one male to one female represents the norm in birds. A better understanding and reporting of ASRs in wild bird populations could contribute greatly to our understanding of population processes and could contribute much to theoretical and applied research and conservation.


Received 21 December 2006; revision accepted 17 April 2007.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00724.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Also of Interest
Journal of Field Ornithology

Journal of Field Ornithology

Journal of Field Ornithology publishes original articles that emphasize the descriptive or experimental study of birds in their natural habitats.

View FREE sample issue

Journal Backfiles