If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||
![]() ArchaeometryVolume 49 Issue 1, Pages 23 - 52 Published Online: 20 Feb 2007 © 2010 University of Oxford Published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1349K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking CLAY RESOURCES AND TECHNICAL CHOICES FOR NEOLITHIC POTTERY (CHALAIN, JURA, FRANCE): CHEMICAL, MINERALOGICAL AND GRAIN-SIZE ANALYSES* Copyright © University of Oxford, 2007 KEYWORDS NEOLITHIC • CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY • JURA • HORGEN • CLAIRVAUX CULTURE • LAKE OF CHALAIN • PETROGRAPHY • CLAY • LASER GRAIN-SIZE ANALYSIS • X-RAY DIFFRACTION • RIETVELD METHOD • TECHNICAL CHOICES ABSTRACTMany authors have considered pottery manufacturing constraints and sociocultural elements as factors in change in past civilizations over time. The main issue of this research is to better understand the reasons for changes, or choices, in pottery raw materials. The very precise and detailed stratigraphy and cultural succession of occupations is based on dendrochronological data from the lake-dwelling sites of Chalain (Jura, France). Petrographic, palaeontological and chemical analyses were used to determine the nature and origins of the raw materials used by the Neolithic potters. Stratigraphy and dendrochronological data were used to reconstruct in detail the evolution dynamics of fabric changes. Several raw material sources were identified for many of the pottery groups. Each of them was sampled for qualitative experimental tests of pottery forming. The experimental results show a high variability between the sediments tested. This variability was quantitatively estimated by XRF, XRD, the Rietveld method, calcium carbonate quantification and laser grain-size analyses of matrices, indirect measures of plasticity. These analytical results allow a better understanding of the differences observed in the experimental tests. On the basis of these experimental and analytical results, changing parameters such as pottery manufacturing constraints, mineralogical characteristics of raw materials and sociocultural factors are considered. In conclusion, all the social and technical parameters, in each archaeological context, must be taken into account for a better understanding of the changes occurring throughout the chronological sequence. Received: 08 September 2005; Accepted: 23 March 2006; |
| |||||||||||