If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Evolutionary BiologyVolume 20 Issue 3, Pages 1028 - 1036 Published Online: 22 Jan 2007 Journal compilation © 2010 European Society for Evolutionary Biology Published on behalf of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB)
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 559K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Increase in song frequency decreases spermatophore size: correlative evidence of a macroevolutionary trade-off in katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Copyright 2007 The Authors Journal Compilation 2007 European Society for Evolutionary Biology KEYWORDS carrier frequency • katydids • sexual selection • sexual size dimorphism • spermatophore • trade-off ABSTRACTIn many katydids, the male feeds his mate with a large gelatinous spermatophore. Males of most species also produce elaborate calling songs. We predicted a negative relationship between spermatophore size and call frequency because of trade-offs between these two costly traits. Our comparative analysis controlling phylogeny and body size supported this prediction. Although call frequency is expected to decrease with increasing body size, after controlling for phylogeny, both variables were not related. Finally, given that song frequency and spermatophore size are likely targets of sexual selection, we examined the relationship between these variables and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) which can be influenced by sexual selection on body size. We found that only female body size was positively related to SSD, suggesting that natural and/or sexual selection on female body size may be stronger than sexual selection on male and spermatophore size. Received 27 September 2006; revised 27 November 2006; accepted 1 December 2006 |