ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of the American Ceramic Society

Journal of the American Ceramic Society

Volume 89 Issue 12, Pages 3788 - 3796

Published Online: 30 Nov 2006

© 2010 American Ceramic Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 3011K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Microstructural Evidence of Reconstituted Limestone Blocks in the Great Pyramids of Egypt
M. W. Barsoum 1 , A. Ganguly 1 and G. Hug 2
  1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
  2 LEM ONERA-CNRS, Châtillon Cedex, France
  Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: barsoumw@drexel.edu

 S. Weiderhorn—contributing editor

 ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy. This work was partially funded by the National Science Foundation (DMR 0503711).

Copyright © 2006 The American Ceramic Society

ABSTRACT

How the Great Pyramids of Giza were built has remained an enduring mystery. In the mid-1980s, Davidovits proposed that the pyramids were cast in situ using granular limestone aggregate and an alkali alumino-silicate-based binder. Hard evidence for this idea, however, remained elusive. Using primarily scanning and transmission electron microscopy, we compared a number of pyramid limestone samples with six different limestone samples from their vicinity. The pyramid samples contained microconstituents (μc's) with appreciable amounts of Si in combination with elements, such as Ca and Mg, in ratios that do not exist in any of the potential limestone sources. The intimate proximity of the μc's suggests that at some time these elements had been together in a solution. Furthermore, between the natural limestone aggregates, the μc's with chemistries reminiscent of calcite and dolomite—not known to hydrate in nature—were hydrated. The ubiquity of Si and the presence of submicron silica-based spheres in some of the micrographs strongly suggest that the solution was basic. Transmission electron microscope confirmed that some of these Si-containing μc's were either amorphous or nanocrystalline, which is consistent with a relatively rapid precipitation reaction. The sophistication and endurance of this ancient concrete technology is simply astounding.


Manuscript No. 21175. Received November 22, 2005; approved August 9, 2006.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01308.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Free Issue

Twitter

Sign Up Now
JACerS

Submit your paper to the Journal of the American Ceramic Society.

  • Ranked number 1 in Materials Science, Ceramics.
  • Current Impact Factor of 2.1.
  • Published on behalf of the American Ceramic Society.
  • International Readership.

Submit your paper to
Journal of the American Ceramic Society