ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 2319K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A comparative study of disc–planet interaction
M. de Val-Borro 1★ , R. G. Edgar 1,2 , P. Artymowicz 1,3 , P. Ciecielag 4,5 , P. Cresswell 6 , G. D'Angelo 7 , E. J. Delgado-Donate 1 , G. Dirksen 8 , S. Fromang 6,9 , A. Gawryszczak 5 , H. Klahr 10 , W. Kley 8 , W. Lyra 11 , F. Masset 12,13 , G. Mellema 14 , R. P. Nelson 6 , S.-J. Paardekooper 14 , A. Peplinski 1 , A. Pierens 6,15 , T. Plewa 16 , K. Rice 17 , C. Schäfer 8 and R. Speith 8
  1 Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden   2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA   3 University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada   4 University Observatory Munich, Scheinerstr. 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany   5 Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, Bartycka 18, Warsaw, PL-00-716, Poland   6 Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS   7 School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL   8 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany   9 DAMTP, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA   10 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany   11 Department of Astronomy & Space Physics, Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Box 515, 751 20, Sweden   12 AIM, UMR 7158 CEA/CNRS/Univ. Paris VII, Service d'Astrophysique, Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France   13 IA-UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, Apartado Postal 70-264, Mexico DF 04510, Mexico   14 Leiden Observatory, PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands   15 Luth, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 92 195 Meudon Cedex, France   16 ASC FLASH Center, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis, Chicago, IL 60637, USA   17 Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ
Correspondence to   E-mail: miguel@astro.su.se
Copyright 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 RAS
KEYWORDS
accretion, accretion discs • hydrodynamics • planets and satellites: general

ABSTRACT

Abstract
          1 INTRODUCTION
          2 DISC PLANET INTERACTION
          3 SETUP DESCRIPTION
          4 DESCRIPTION OF THE CODESREFERENCES

We perform numerical simulations of a disc–planet system using various grid-based and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) codes. The tests are run for a simple setup where Jupiter and Neptune mass planets on a circular orbit open a gap in a protoplanetary disc during a few hundred orbital periods. We compare the surface density contours, potential vorticity and smoothed radial profiles at several times. The disc mass and gravitational torque time evolution are analysed with high temporal resolution. There is overall consistency between the codes. The density profiles agree within about 5 per cent for the Eulerian simulations. The SPH results predict the correct shape of the gap although have less resolution in the low-density regions and weaker planetary wakes. The disc masses after 200 orbital periods agree within 10 per cent. The spread is larger in the tidal torques acting on the planet which agree within a factor of 2 at the end of the simulation. In the Neptune case, the dispersion in the torques is greater than for Jupiter, possibly owing to the contribution from the not completely cleared region close to the planet.


Accepted 2006 April 11. Received 2006 March 8; in original form 2005 October 24

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10488.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member