If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||
![]() Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySee Also: Volume 370 Issue 2, Pages 529 - 558 Published Online: 26 Jun 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 RAS A Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 2319K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking A comparative study of disc–planet interaction Copyright 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 RAS KEYWORDS accretion, accretion discs • hydrodynamics • planets and satellites: general ABSTRACT
We perform numerical simulations of a disc–planet system using various grid-based and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) codes. The tests are run for a simple setup where Jupiter and Neptune mass planets on a circular orbit open a gap in a protoplanetary disc during a few hundred orbital periods. We compare the surface density contours, potential vorticity and smoothed radial profiles at several times. The disc mass and gravitational torque time evolution are analysed with high temporal resolution. There is overall consistency between the codes. The density profiles agree within about 5 per cent for the Eulerian simulations. The SPH results predict the correct shape of the gap although have less resolution in the low-density regions and weaker planetary wakes. The disc masses after 200 orbital periods agree within 10 per cent. The spread is larger in the tidal torques acting on the planet which agree within a factor of 2 at the end of the simulation. In the Neptune case, the dispersion in the torques is greater than for Jupiter, possibly owing to the contribution from the not completely cleared region close to the planet. Accepted 2006 April 11. Received 2006 March 8; in original form 2005 October 24 |