ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Ecological Management & Restoration

Ecological Management & Restoration

Volume 7 Issue s1, Pages S10 - S17

Published Online: 11 May 2006

Journal compilation © 2009 Ecological Society of Australia



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 325K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

REVIEW ARTICLE
An overview of methods used to assess vegetation condition at the scale of the site
Philip Gibbons and David Freudenberger

Philip Gibbons is an ecologist with the Department of Environment and Conservation (New South Wales) based at CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems (GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Tel. 02 6242 1774. Fax 02 6242 1705. Email: phil.gibbons@csiro.au). David Freudenberger is a senior research scientist with CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems (GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: david.freudenberger@csiro.au). Both authors have an ongoing interest in translating ecological principles into methods and tools that are appropriate for managers.

Copyright © 2006 The Authors
Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
KEYWORDS
metric • rapid biodiversity assessment • scoring systems • vegetation condition

ABSTRACT

Summary  Rapid, on-ground assessments of vegetation condition are frequently used as a basis for landholder education, development applications, distributing incentive funds, prescribing restoration treatments and monitoring change. We provide an overview of methods used to rapidly assess vegetation condition for these purposes. We encourage those developing new approaches to work through the steps we have presented here, namely define management objectives and operational constraints; develop an appropriate conceptual framework for the ecosystems under consideration; select an appropriate suite of indicators; and consider the options available for combining these into an index. We argue that information must be gained from broader scales to make decisions about the condition of individual sites. Remote sensing and spatial modelling might be more appropriate methods than on-ground assessments for obtaining this information. However, we believe that spatial prediction of vegetation condition will only add value to on-ground assessments rather than replace them. This is because the current techniques for spatially predicting vegetation condition cannot capture all of the information in a site assessment or at the required level of accuracy, and maps cannot replace the exchange of information between assessors and land managers that is an important component of on-ground assessment. There is scope for more sophistication in the way on-ground assessments of vegetation condition are undertaken, but the challenge will be to maintain the simplicity that makes rapid on-ground assessment a popular vehicle for informing natural resource management. We encourage greater peer review and publishing in this field to facilitate greater exchange of ideas and experiences.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1442-8903.2006.00286.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here