ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Biological Reviews

Biological Reviews

Volume 81 Issue 3, Pages 383 - 406

Published Online: 15 Mar 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 Cambridge Philosophical Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 262K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds
R. M. Kilner* 1
  1 Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK (E-mail: rmk1002@hermes.cam.ac.uk)
Correspondence to   *Tel: +44 1223 331766; Fax: +44 1223 336676.
Copyright 2006 Cambridge Philosophical Society
KEYWORDS
interclutch variation • intraclutch variation • carotenoid • Cuculus canorus • pigment • biliverdin • porphyrin

ABSTRACT

AbstractVIII. REFERENCES

Avian eggs differ so much in their colour and patterning from species to species that any attempt to account for this diversity might initially seem doomed to failure. Here I present a critical review of the literature which, when combined with the results of some comparative analyses, suggests that just a few selective agents can explain much of the variation in egg appearance. Ancestrally, bird eggs were probably white and immaculate. Ancient diversification in nest location, and hence in the clutch's vulnerability to attack by predators, can explain basic differences between bird families in egg appearance. The ancestral white egg has been retained by species whose nests are safe from attack by predators, while those that have moved to a more vulnerable nest site are now more likely to lay brown eggs, covered in speckles, just as Wallace hypothesized more than a century ago. Even blue eggs might be cryptic in a subset of nests built in vegetation. It is possible that some species have subsequently turned these ancient adaptations to new functions, for example to signal female quality, to protect eggs from damaging solar radiation, or to add structural strength to shells when calcium is in short supply. The threat of predation, together with the use of varying nest sites, appears to have increased the diversity of egg colouring seen among species within families, and among clutches within species. Brood parasites and their hosts have probably secondarily influenced the diversity of egg appearance. Each drives the evolution of the other's egg colour and patterning, as hosts attempt to avoid exploitation by rejecting odd-looking eggs from their nests, and parasites attempt to outwit their hosts by laying eggs that will escape detection. This co-evolutionary arms race has increased variation in egg appearance both within and between species, in parasites and in hosts, sometimes resulting in the evolution of egg colour polymorphisms. It has also reduced variation in egg appearance within host clutches, although the benefit thus gained by hosts is not clear.


(Received 15 July 2005; revised 21 March 2006; accepted 22 March 2006)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1017/S1464793106007044 About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Sign up here
Journal Backfiles