ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volume 50 Issue 1, Pages 92 - 98

Published Online: 15 Nov 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 103K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The effect of tracheostomy on outcome in intensive care unit patients
H. Flaatten 1,3 *, S. Gjerde 1 , J. H. Heimdal 2 and S. Aardal 1
Departments of   1 Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and   2 Otorhinolaryngology, Haukeland University Hospital, and   3 University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Correspondence to   *Dr Hans Flaatten
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Haukeland University Hospital
5021 Bergen
Norway
e-mail: hkfl@helse-bergen.no
Copyright Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005
KEYWORDS
intensive care • outcome • survival • tracheostomy

ABSTRACT

Background: Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) is increasingly being used in the intensive care unit (ICU), and has probably increased the number of procedures performed. The primary aim of this study was to document the short- and long-term outcome of patients with a tracheostomy performed during an ICU stay.

Methods: Patients in our ICU who underwent an unplanned tracheostomy between 1997 and 2003 were included in this analysis. The type of tracheostomy (PDT or surgical tracheostomy) and time of the procedure were registered prospectively in our ICU database. Survival was followed using the People's Registry of Norway and morbidity data from the individual hospital record. These patients were also compared with a group of ICU patients ventilated for more than 24 h, but managed without a tracheostomy. We also compared patients who had early tracheostomy (less than median time to procedure) with those who had late tracheostomy.

Results: Of the 2844 admissions (2581 patients), unplanned tracheostomy was performed during 461 admissions (16.2%) on 454 patients (17.6%). The median time to tracheostomy was 6 days. The ICU, hospital and 1-year mortality rates were 10.8, 27.1 and 37.2%, respectively, significantly less than those of the group ventilated without tracheostomy. The median time to decannulation was 14 days. Patients who had early tracheostomy had a more favourable long-term survival than those who had late tracheostomy. No procedure-related mortality was registered.

Conclusions: In our ICU, having a tracheostomy performed was associated with a favourable long-term outcome with regard to survival, and early tracheostomy improved survival in addition to consuming less ICU resources.


Accepted for publication 17 August 2005

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00898.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


ESA 2010 - Register Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Submit your article today
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now