ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 205K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments
Uri Gneezy 1 andJohn A List 2,1
  1 The Rady School of Management, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.; ugneezy@gsb.uchicago.edu   2 Dept. of Economics at Chicago, University of Chicago, 5807 South Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.; NBER, and RFF; jlist@uchicago.edu.
 

1 A co-editor and four anonymous reviewers provided comments that significantly improved the study. Ernst Fehr and Glenn Harrison also provided remarks that improved the manuscript. Stefan Andersen provided fine research assistance. Craig Landry, Andreas Lange, Michael Price and Nicholas Rupp also helped with gathering the data. Jamie Brown-Kruse worked with us in her capacity as the Director of the Hazards Center.

Copyright The Econometric Society 2006
KEYWORDS
Gift exchange • field experiment

ABSTRACT

Recent discoveries in behavioral economics have led scholars to question the underpinnings of neoclassical economics. We use insights gained from one of the most influential lines of behavioral research—gift exchange—in an attempt to maximize worker effort in two quite distinct tasks: data entry for a university library and door-to-door fundraising for a research center. In support of the received literature, our field evidence suggests that worker effort in the first few hours on the job is considerably higher in the "gift" treatment than in the "nongift" treatment. After the initial few hours, however, no difference in outcomes is observed, and overall the gift treatment yielded inferior aggregate outcomes for the employer: with the same budget we would have logged more data for our library and raised more money for our research center by using the market-clearing wage rather than by trying to induce greater effort with a gift of higher wages.


Manuscript received August, 2005; final revision received May, 2006.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00707.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member