ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Psychophysiology

Psychophysiology

Volume 43 Issue 2, Pages 137 - 144

Published Online: 18 May 2006

Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Psychophysiological Research



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 372K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Habituation of auditory evoked potentials in intracranial and extracranial recordings
Timm Rosburg a , Peter Trautner a , Nashaat N. Boutros b , Oleg A. Korzyukov b , Carlo Schaller c , Christian Erich Elger a and Martin Kurthen a
  a Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
  b School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
  c Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
Correspondence to  Address reprint requests to: T. Rosburg, Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: timm.rosburg@ukb.uni-bonn.de.

 Supported by the NIH under grant number R01 MH063476.

Copyright Copyright © 2006 Society for Psychophysiological Research
KEYWORDS
Auditory evoked potentials • Auditory cortex • Electrocorticography • Sensory gating

Abstract

AbstractREFERENCES

Effects of stimulus repetition are investigated in short-term habituation experiments. In these experiments, trains of stimuli are applied with longer intervals of no stimulation between the trains. In scalp recordings, an amplitude and latency decrease of the auditory N100 is usually observed at the beginning of the train. This contrasts to a recent finding with intracranial recordings, exhibiting an effect on N100 amplitude, but not on its latency. In the current study, P50 and N100 were simultaneously recorded intra- and extracranially in epilepsy patients. The amplitudes of P50 and N100 decreased in both recordings, whereas the P50 latency was not significantly affected. A latency decrease was revealed for the extracranially recorded N100, but not for the intracranial N100. This dissociation between the intracranial and scalp recordings might be explained by a different sensitivity of the two measurements for N100 generators.


Received September 6, 2005; Accepted February 9, 2006)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00391.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign-up for Content Alerts
Introducing

Cognitive Science Journals

In 2009, Wiley-Blackwell is proud to publish Cognitive Science and the new journal Topics in Cognitive Science on behalf of the Cognitive Science Society.

Visit the Society site

Member Benefit


ATTENTION SOCIETY FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH MEMBERS:
You have access to all issues of Psychophysiology online from Volume 1, Issue 1 to today’s.

Psychology