ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Bioethics

Bioethics

Volume 20 Issue 1, Pages 24 - 36

Published Online: 21 Dec 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 118K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

RETURNING GENETIC RESEARCH RESULTS TO INDIVIDUALS: POINTS-TO-CONSIDER
GAILE RENEGAR 1 , CHRISTOPHER J. WEBSTER 2 , STEFFEN STUERZEBECHER 3 , LEA HARTY 4 , SUSAN E. IDE 5 , BETH BALKITE 6 , TARYN A. ROGALSKI-SALTER 7 , NADINE COHEN 8 , BRIAN B. SPEAR 9 , DIANE M. BARNES 10 AND CELIA BRAZELL 11, 1
  1 Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, RTP NC 27709, USA.
  2 Regulatory Strategy and Intelligence, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, 40 Lansdowne Street, Cambridge MA 02139, USA.
  3 Schering AG, D-13342 Berlin, Germany.
  4 Clinical Pharmacogenomics, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton CT06340, USA.
  5 Biomarker Development, Novartis, 100 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139-3585, USA.
  6 Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive RTP NC 27709, USA.
  7 Global Regulatory Policy, Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co. Inc., West Point, USA.
  8 Pharmacogenomics, Drug Discovery, Johnson & Johnson, Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Raritan NJ 08869, USA.
  9 Pharmacogenetics, Abbott Laboratories, Dept. 424, Bldg AP6A, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6008, USA.
  10 Project Management, GPRA, Abbott Laboratories, 200 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA.
  11 Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, Middlesex UB6 0HE, UK.
Correspondence to  Gaile Renegar, Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, RTP NC 27709, USA. gaile.l.renegar@gsk.com; Christopher J. Webster, Regulatory Strategy and Intelligence, Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, 40 Lansdowne Street, Cambridge MA 02139, USA. chris.webster@mpi.com; Steffen Stuerzebecher, Schering AG, D-13342 Berlin, Germany. claus-steffen.stuerzebecher@schering.de; Lea Harty, Clinical Pharmacogenomics, Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton CT06340, USA. lea_c_harty@groton.pfizer.com; Susan E. Ide, Biomarker Development, Novartis, 100 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139-3585, USA. susan.ide@pharma.novartis.com; Beth Balkite, Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive RTP NC 27709, USA. Beth.a.balkite@gsk.com; Taryn A. Rogalski-Salter, Global Regulatory Policy, Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co. Inc., BLX-22, PO Box 4, West Point, PA 19486, USA. Taryn_rogalskisalter@merck.com; Nadine Cohen, Pharmacogenomics, Drug Discovery, Johnson & Johnson, Pharmaceutical Research & Development, 1000 Route 202, P.O. Box 300, Raritan NJ 08869, USA. NCohen2@prdus.jnj.com; Brian B. Spear, Pharmacogenetics, Abbott Laboratories, Dept. 424, Bldg AP6A, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6008, USA. brian.spear@abbott.com; Diane M. Barnes, Project Management, GPRA, Abbott Laboratories, 200 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA. diane.m.barnes@abbott.com; Celia Brazell, Genetics Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, Middlesex UB6 0HE, UK. CB30662@gsk.com
Copyright © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
pharmacogenetic • genetic • research • results • exploratory • guidelines • policy

ABSTRACT

Abstract

This paper is intended to stimulate debate amongst stakeholders in the international research community on the topic of returning individual genetic research results to study participants. Pharmacogenetics and disease genetics studies are becoming increasingly prevalent, leading to a growing body of information on genetic associations for drug responsiveness and disease susceptibility with the potential to improve health care. Much of these data are presently characterized as exploratory (non-validated or hypothesis-generating). There is, however, a trend for research participants to be permitted access to their personal data if they so choose. Researchers, sponsors, patient advocacy groups, ethics committees and regulatory authorities are consequently confronting the issue of whether, and how, study participants might receive their individual results. Noted international ethico-legal guidelines and public policy positions in Europe and the United States are reviewed for background. The authors offer 'Points-to-Consider' regarding returning research results in the context of drug development trials based on their knowledge and experience. These considerations include: the clinical relevance of data, laboratory qualifications, informed consent procedures, confidentiality of medical information and the competency of persons providing results to participants. The discussion is framed as a benefit-to-risk assessment to balance the potential positive versus negative consequences to participants, while maintaining the integrity and feasibility of conducting genetic research studies.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00473.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Developing World Bioethics