ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Research in Reading

Journal of Research in Reading

Volume 29 Issue 2, Pages 162 - 172

Published Online: 13 Feb 2006

© 2010 United Kingdom Literacy Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 85K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students
Paul Macaruso 1 , Pamela E. Hook 2 , Robert McCabe 3
  1 Community College of Rhode Island, Lincoln RI, USA
  2 MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
  3 Lexia Learning Systems, Lincoln MA, USA
  Address for correspondence: Paul Macaruso, Department of Psychology, Community College of Rhode Island, 1762 Louisquisset Pike, Lincoln, RI 02865, USA. E-mail: pmacaruso@ccri.edu
Copyright © United Kingdom Literacy Association 2006

ABSTRACT

In this study we examined the benefits of computer programs designed to supplement regular reading instruction in an urban public school system. The programs provide systematic exercises for mastering word-attack strategies. Our findings indicate that first graders who participated in the programs made significant reading gains over the school year. Their post-test scores were slightly (but not significantly) greater than the post-test scores of control children who received regular reading instruction without the programs. When analyses were restricted to low-performing children eligible for Title I services, significantly higher post-test scores were obtained by the treatment group compared to the control group. At post-test Title I children in the treatment group performed at levels similar to non-Title I students.


Received 18 June 2004; revised version received 5 March 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00282.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


IT'S TIME TO RENEW

JRIR

It’s time to renew your subscription to Journal of Research in Reading.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Education