If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() EthologyVolume 112 Issue 11, Pages 1041 - 1049 Published Online: 25 Jul 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 107K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking RESEARCH PAPERS Seasonal Variation in Female Response to Male Calling Song in the Field Cricket, Gryllus rubens Copyright 2006 The Authors Journal compilation 2006 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin Abstract
Conspicuous traits that make males attractive to females may make them vulnerable to predators. Females that approach conspicuous males may increase their risk of predation. This means that selection for reduced male conspicuousness in the presence of predators may be due to sexual selection resulting from altered female behavior in the face of increased predator risk. We examine this hypothesis in the field cricket, Gryllus rubens, in which male calling song attracts both conspecific females for mating and parasitoid flies (Ormia ochracea) which kill their hosts within a week. Female crickets are also parasitized by these flies as a result of associating with calling males. In northern Florida crickets that emerge in the spring are not subject to fly parasitism whereas autumn crickets encounter large numbers of flies. We predicted that autumn females should be less attracted to male song than spring females. We tested female response to male calls in a rectangular arena in which male calling song was broadcast from a speaker. Spring females readily approached the speaker but autumn females were less likely to approach and remain in the vicinity of the speaker. These results emphasize the importance of considering how risk affects the evolution of conspicuous male behavior both directly through its effect on the male and indirectly through its effect on female responses to males. Received: January 9, 2006 Initial acceptance: February 23, 2006 Final acceptance: March 14, 2006 (S. Forbes) |