If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Renaissance StudiesVolume 20 Issue 3, Pages 356 - 378 Published Online: 16 May 2006 Journal Compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Journal of the Society for Renaissance Studies
Abstract | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 498K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Macbeth and Hercules Copyright © 2006 The Author Journal compilation © 2006 The Society for Renaissance Studies, Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS Macbeth • Hercules • King James • political • conciliation • humanist ABSTRACTThis paper draws upon an iconographical topos and a political debate for its historical appreciation of Macbeth. It shows that Shakespeare sets up two opposing heroic ideals in this tragedy; the chivalric warrior hero and the humanist intellectual paragon of reason and virtue. Both are personified by two contrasting Renaissance adaptations of the mythical Hercules: the model of physical strength and victor of all battles, and the Hercules whose heroism resides in his superior intellectual strength and will power. At the crossroads of life he chooses the path of virtue and rejects vice and pleasure. At the beginning of the tragedy Macbeth is identified with Hercules, the invincible fighter. He fails, however, the test of Hercules in bivio, when he meets the weird sisters. His tragedy implies a radical critique of the heroic ideal of manliness and the conviction that fortitude and valour are the best way to assure justice and peace. Macbeth takes sides in the controversy between King James and a faction at Prince Henry's Court, which contested the King's policy of conciliation and peace and glorified the chivalrous ideal of martial strength. |
| ||||||||