ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 173K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Safety and efficacy of two dose formulations of alicaforsen enema compared with mesalazine enema for treatment of mild to moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial
P. B. MINER JR*, M. K. WEDEL, S. XIA & B. F. BAKER
  *Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, Health Sciences Center, University of Oklahoma, OK, USA ;   Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA
Correspondence to Dr P. B. Miner Jr, Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, 1000 N Lincoln Blvd, Ste 210, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
E-mail: kay-springer@ouhsc.edu
Copyright 2006 Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Journal compilation 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Summary

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences

Background

Alicaforsen is an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 protein expression with activity in subjects with ulcerative colitis and pouchitis.

Aim

To compare the effects of alicaforsen enema to standard of care mesalazine (mesalamine) enema in subjects with mild to moderate active left-sided ulcerative colitis.

Method

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled multicentre clinical trial. Subjects received a nightly enema of 120 mg alicaforsen (n = 55), 240 mg alicaforsen (n = 50), or 4 g mesalazine (n = 54) for 6 weeks, followed by a 24-week monitoring period. The primary end point was Disease Activity Index at week 6. Clinical improvement, remission and relapse were secondary end points.

Results

No significant difference was observed between treatment arms in the primary end point. However, the median duration of response to alicaforsen enema treatment was two- to threefold longer (128 and 146 days) in comparison with mesalazine (54 days). Complete mucosal healing occurred in 24% of the 240 mg alicaforsen group, when compared with 17% in the mesalazine.

Conclusions

Alicaforsen enema demonstrated an acute response and safety profile similar to mesalazine enema, but was differentiated by a more durable response. The extended length of remission suggests that alicaforsen enema treatment may have a disease modifying effect.


Publication data Submitted 16 December 2005 First decision 23 December 2005 Resubmitted 6 January 2006 Accepted 7 January 2006

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02837.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Click here
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter