If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Journal of Public Economic TheoryVolume 8 Issue 4, Pages 631 - 676 Published Online: 29 Sep 2006 © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published on behalf of the Association for Public Economic Theory
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 464K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking
Tax Reform with Useful Public Expenditures
Steven P. Cassou, Department of Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 (scassou@ksu.edu). Kevin J. Lansing, Economic Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94120 (kevin.j.lansing@sf.frb.org). For helpful comments and suggestions, we thank Kenneth Judd, Ignacio Palacios-Huerta, Richard Rogerson, seminar participants at many places, the editor of this journal, and two anonymous referees. This project was started while Lansing was a national fellow at the Hoover Institution, whose hospitality is gratefully acknowledged. Copyright 2006 Blackwell Publishing, Inc. Abstract
We examine the effects of tax reform in an endogenous growth with two types of useful public expenditures. The optimal fiscal policy shifts the tax base to private consumption and generally requires a change in the size of government. If a tax reform holds the size of government fixed to satisfy a revenue-neutrality constraint, then the reform will be suboptimal; theory alone cannot tell us if welfare will be improved. For some model calibrations, we find that a revenue-neutral consumption tax reform can result in large welfare gains. For other quite plausible calibrations, the exact same reform can result in tiny or even negative welfare gains as the revenue-neutrality constraint becomes more severely binding. Overall, our results highlight the uncertainty surrounding the potential welfare benefits of fundamental tax reform. Received May 14, 2004; Accepted February 18, 2005. |
|
Member Benefit
|
IT'S TIME TO RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP
| ||||||||||||||||||||||