ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 149K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

REVIEW ARTICLE
CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
Alexios A. Adamides,*†‡ Craig D. Winter,* Philip M. Lewis,* D. James Cooper,†§ Thomas Kossmann†¶ Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld*‡
Departments of   * Neurosurgery ,  Traumaand  §Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital,  National Trauma Institute, and  Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
 Correspondence: Professor Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld, Department of Neurosurgery, The Alfred Hospital, PO Box 315, Prahran, Vic. 3181, Australia.
Email: j.rosenfeld@alfred.org.au

  A. A. Adamides BMBS, BMedSci;  C. D. Winter MB, BChir, FRCS (SN);  P. M. Lewis BAppSc;  D. J. Cooper FRACP, MO;  T. Kossmann FRACS, MD;  J. V. Rosenfeld FRACS, MS.

Copyright 2006 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
KEYWORDS
traumatic brain injury • review

ABSTRACT

Background:  Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, particularly among young men. The efficacy and safety of most of the interventions used in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury remain unproven. Examples include the 'cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted' and 'volume-targeted' management strategies for optimizing cerebrovascular haemodynamics and specific interventions, such as hyperventilation, osmotherapy, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, barbiturates, decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, normobaric hyperoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

Methods:  A review of the literature was performed to examine the evidence base behind each intervention.

Results:  There is no class I evidence to support the routine use of any of the therapies examined.

Conclusion:  Well-designed, large, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine therapies that are safe and effective from those that are ineffective or harmful.


Accepted for publication 31 August 2005.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03674.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now