If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||
![]() Perspektiven der WirtschaftspolitikVolume 7 Issue 1, Pages 105 - 126 Published Online: 30 Jan 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd und Verein für Socialpolitik Published on behalf of Verein für Socialpolitik
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 153K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Zur Reform der Professorenbesoldung in Deutschland* *Ich danke Ulf Bosserhoff, Christian Grund, Oliver Gürtler, Christine Harbring, Thomas Schuh sowie einem anonymen Gutachter für ihre hilfreichen kritischen Anmerkungen. Für finanzielle Unterstützung im Rahmen des Sonderforschungsbereichs/Transregio 15 „Governance und die Effizienz ökonomischer Systeme” sei der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gedankt. Copyright Verein für Socialpolitik und Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2006 Abstract:
Abstract: The 'Gesetz zur Reform der Professorenbesoldung (ProfBesReformG)' lays down that the pay of German professors shall be linked more closely to their actual performance. Furthermore, total payment to all professors shall be fixed in advance. Combining both characteristics leads to an incentive scheme which is well known in labor economics – a tournament or contest, in which agents are rewarded according to relative performance. In this article, the results of the tournament theory are used to discuss possible advantages and disadvantages of the ProfBesReformG. In principle, the ministry of each federal state has to choose between two alternative ways in organizing a professors' tournament. There can be either a tournament within each faculty, or a tournament between different faculties. Unfortunately, both alternatives are problematic for different reasons. Received: 28 February 2002; Accepted: 09 September 2002; |