ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 169K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Law and Literature in the Romantic Era: The Law's Fictions
Sue Chaplin 1*
  1 Leeds Metropolitan University
Copyright © Blackwell Publishing 2006

Abstract

AbstractThe Text Before the LawThe Law s Fictions
          Caleb Williams  A most evil work, anti-Christian and anti-law NotesWorks Cited

This essay examines the emerging ideological relation between literature and law in the Romantic era and the significance of this relation to modern Western conceptualisations of what constitutes 'law' and 'literature'. In particular, the article explores the problematics of juridical textuality in the Romantic period – the extent to which the law comes to be regarded as text– and seeks to set this within the context of developing conceptualisations of 'literature' as a juridically defined commodity. The modern understanding of 'literature' began to be shaped in the Romantic era by a juridical re-formulation of the relation between the author, the text, the reader and the publisher: creative, original writing –'literature'– becomes a commodity copyrighted to an author/publisher. This development is accompanied by the State's recognition of the growing cultural and political power of new and diverse textual forms in an era of the mass production and consumption of 'literature', and the article considers alongside the contemporaneous formulation of copyright regulations the draconian censorship of textual production in this period. With reference to diverse juridical and literary sources (Clara Reeve's The Progress of Romance, Blackstone's Commentaries, Bentham's Fragment on Government, Godwin's Enquiry and Caleb Williams, amongst others), I examine the extent to which these various phenomena reveal the subjection of textuality in the Romantic era to the modern force of law.


Literature Compass 3/4 (2006): 804–817, 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00351.x

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00351.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member