Dynamic Balance and Stepping Versus Tai Chi Training to Improve Balance and Stepping in At-Risk Older Adults

doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00971.x

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volume 54 Issue 12, Pages 1825 - 1831

Published Online: 29 Nov 2006

Journal compilation 2010 The American Geriatrics Society/Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Published on behalf of

Go to Society Site

< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile Download Citation Request Permissions

Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 99K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Dynamic Balance and Stepping Versus Tai Chi Training to Improve Balance and Stepping in At-Risk Older Adults

Joseph O. Nnodim, MD, PhD ^*† , Debra Strasburg, MS ^* , Martina Nabozny, BA ^* , Linda Nyquist, PhD ^‡ , Andrzej Galecki, PhD, MD ^‡ , Shu Chen, MS ^‡ , and Neil B. Alexander, MD ^*‡†

From the ^*Mobility Research Center, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and ^‡Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and ^†Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Address correspondence to Neil Alexander, MD, Geriatrics Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: nalexand@umich.edu

KEYWORDS

balance • exercise • tai chi • falls • aged

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of two 10-week balance training programs, Combined Balance and Step Training (CBST) versus tai chi (TC), on balance and stepping measures.

DESIGN: Prospective intervention trial.

SETTING: Local senior centers and congregate housing facilities.

PARTICIPANTS: Aged 65 and older with at least mild impairment in the ability to perform unipedal stance and tandem walk.

INTERVENTION: Participants were allocated to TC (n= 107, mean age 78) or CBST, an intervention focused on improving dynamic balance and stepping (n=106, mean age 78).

MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and 10 weeks, participants were tested in their static balance (Unipedal Stance and Tandem Stance (TS)), stepping (Maximum Step Length, Rapid Step Test), and Timed Up and Go (TUG).

RESULTS: Performance improved more with CBST than TC, ranging from 5% to 10% for the stepping tests (Maximum Step Length and Rapid Step Test) and 9% for TUG. The improvement in TUG represented an improvement of more than 1 second. Greater improvements were also seen in static balance ability (in TS) with CBST than TC.

CONCLUSION: Of the two training programs, in which variants of each program have been proven to reduce falls, CBST results in modest improvements in balance, stepping, and functional mobility versus TC over a 10-week period. Future research should include a prospective comparison of fall rates in response to these two balance training programs.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00971.x About DOI