If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Family RelationsVolume 55 Issue 4, Pages 499 - 509 Published Online: 7 Sep 2006 © 2009 by the National Council on Family Relations Published on behalf of the National Council on Family Relations
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 113K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect* *Support for this research and for preparation of this article was provided in part by a grant (5-RO1-MH35525-12) from the National Institute of Mental Health, Division of Services and Intervention Research, Adult and Geriatric Treatment and Prevention Branch (awarded to H.J.M., S.M.S., and Lydia M. Prado). Copyright 2006 by the National Council on Family Relations KEYWORDS cohabitation • commitment • divorce • marriage • relationships ABSTRACTAbstract: Premarital cohabitation has consistently been found to be associated with increased risk for divorce and marital distress in the United States. Two explanations for this "cohabitation effect" are discussed: selection and experience. We present an empirically based view of how the experience of cohabitation may increase risk for relationship distress or divorce for some people beyond what is accounted for by selection. Specifically, using a commitment framework, we suggest that some couples who otherwise would not have married end up married because of the inertia of cohabitation. We discuss practice implications for relationship transitions that are characterized more by sliding than deciding, especially where a transition such as cohabitation increases inertia to remain in a relationship regardless of quality or fit. Received: 21 June 2006; Accepted: 28 August 2006; |