If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Eukaryotic MicrobiologyVolume 53 Issue 3, Pages 204 - 210 Published Online: 10 Apr 2006 Journal compilation © 2010 The International Society of Protistologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 728K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Phylogeny and Ultrastructure of Miliammina fusca: Evidence for Secondary Loss of Calcification in a Miliolid Foraminifer Copyright © 2006 by the International Society of Protistologists KEYWORDS Calcification • Foraminifera • fossil record • morphology • phylogeny • SSU • test • β-tubulin ABSTRACTABSTRACT. The classification of the Foraminifera, a widely distributed group of largely marine protists, has traditionally been based on morphological characters. The most important of these are the composition and structure of the shell or "test." Here, we use both phylogenetic analysis of the genes for small subunit rRNA and β-tubulin and ultrastructural analysis to document a reversion in wall type from more derived calcareous tests to an agglutinated test. These data indicate that the genus Miliammina, and possibly other members of the Rzehakinidae, should be placed in the Order Miliolida as opposed to their current assignment in Order Textulariida. We also address the effects this reversion may have had on the ability of rzehakinacids to effectively colonize marginal marine environments. Finally, the hypothesis that some multilocular agglutinated foraminiferans descended from calcareous lineages has implications for interpretation of the foraminiferal fossil record. Received: 11/23/05, 01/31/06; accepted: 02/01/06 |