If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||
![]() Zygon®Volume 41 Issue 1, Pages 9 - 20 Published Online: 23 Feb 2006 © 2009 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon Published on behalf of IRAS and CASIRAS
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 44K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking ANIMALS, ANIMISTS, AND ACADEMICS Copyright 2006 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon KEYWORDS animals • animism • Marc Bekoff • ethnography • ethology • methods • nature • other-than-human persons • personalism • persons • relationality • respect • totemism ABSTRACTAbstract. Animism is the label given to worldviews in which the world is understood to be a community of living persons, only some of whom are human. (An older use of the term to label a putative "belief in spirits" is less useful.) Animists inculcate locally meaningful means of communicating with other-than-human persons, especially in order to express respect. Ethnographic accounts of particular animist ways of engaging with animal persons are noted. I argue that ethologists interested in engaging respectfully with animals while researching cognition, behavior, and other critical issues may find their research methods and results enhanced by learning from animists about tested methods of communicating with animals. The mediation of animists in this communicative engagement between animals and those who research among them is proposed not as a romantic gloss on modernist culture but in full recognition that the challenge offered by dialogue with marginalized and excluded "others" may result in a reconfiguration of academic protocols. Nonetheless, this entry into full relationality is seriously posed as an improved means of achieving established goals of understanding animals, humans, and the world we coinhabit. |
|
![]()
|
IT'S TIME TO RENEW
| |||||||||||